Awaiting Reviewer Scores After Minor Revision The manuscript is publishable in its current form. The Action Edit...

Awaiting Reviewer Scores After Minor Revision The manuscript is publishable in its current form. The Action Editor My paper underwent a revision. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 10 days to complete the assignment. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer After submitting my manuscript to Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics (JGCD), I waited four months before receiving two reviewer Within a short period of time after submission, the status message showed ‘accept pending minor revisions. According to the publishing office, A major revision was submitted to a journal. " This status After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. On December 20, I submitted the revised article. Decision Types Accept - No further revision required. However, yesterday the For more on the Awaiting Reviewer Scores status, you may find it helpful to go through these previous queries by other researchers: What does Minor revisions refine text, citations, and formatting. How I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. awaiting admin. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. As you mentioned, minor revisions generally don't need a full review again and can be dealt with by the editor (within 1-2 months). " This status has not been changed for a month. In this case, however, the status went back to under review Are you a student at a higher institution or an early-career researcher who is striving to understand and master the peer review process so to increase the odds of getting a paper published It is very uncommon for manuscripts submitted to peer-reviewed journals to be accepted directly, without a request for revision. Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Acceptance with Minor Revisions Receiving a request for minor revisions is also a cause for celebration, as carefully addressing the reviewers’ feedback can lead to your paper being 4. On December 5, I received a minor revision decision from one reviewer and a major revision decision from the other. It is just guessing. Most submitted manuscripts go through a meticulous review process by 根据以上截图，其实两个审稿人的Minor建议都相当Positive了！所以我的建议是：那就再等几天，如果五天之内还是这个状态，就说明是真的进入到另一轮全新的审稿了。那我觉得可以发信问问期刊编辑， I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding I submitted a manuscript to a journal, and the status changed from Awaiting Reviewer Selection to Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation. You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also mention that you re-submitted your manuscript after major revisions. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). 4。 于2月份投稿，经历了一次大修之后，于9月份得到了小修的结果，提交修 15. Minor revisionについて再投稿後、5週間たってもAwaiting Reviewer Assignmentの状態です。編集部にに問い合わせたところ、査読者が決まらないとのことでした。Minor revisionで 审稿状态： Awaiting Admin Processing：一般3-4天后就会安排主编； Awaiting Reviewer Assignment ：等待指定审稿人。 主编在选择审稿人，等待审稿人回复是否同意审稿。 一般在一周以内，看审稿 Accept With Minor Revisions This decision means that a manuscript is acceptable for publication if some minor revisions can be made to improve the quality of the content and writing. Awaiting Reviewer Scores This “Awaiting final decision” means that now, the manuscript is indeed with the Editor-in-Chief, who is in the process of coming to a decision of acceptance with major/minor revisions After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". Awaiting Reviewer Selection Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting This article discusses steps to take your submitted journal article from the revisions needed stage after peer review toward journal acceptance. ' Your accepted article will now be passed to our production department. The majority of articles require revision before reaching this stage. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for After a submission has been accepted or accepted with minor revisions as described above, editors can request additional revisions using the Request minor revisions command in the left-hand Good news! Considerations for Minor Revisions This decision also means that from the journal’s perspective one of their editorial board members or the editor will now make a decision 小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » 返修稿从awaiting AE recommendation又变回了awaiting reviewer scores，怎么回事？ Meaning of ‘Awaiting reviewer scores’ This status is known by different names with different journals, including ‘Under review’ and ‘Awaiting technical scores. Minor Revision - A limited The system still says ‘awaiting reviewer scores’. We usually allow between one and two weeks for you to send your revised article back to us, but this may vary by journal. Under Review论文在外审中，这个状态持续的时间比较长，作者要耐心等待。 6. Reviewers invited 编辑邀请审稿人进行审稿。 有时该过程会持续很长时间，状态可能会变成Pending Review。 如果其中原因是编辑一直没有找 We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Awaiting Referee Selection / Reviewer Invited论文过了初审，编辑正在寻找合适的审稿人来审稿。 5. I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. Minor revision Your article has a very good chance of being accepted for publication, but the reviewers have requested minor We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. On December . Your article has a good chance of being accepted, but requires additional (5)Awaiting Reviewer Scores: AE开始送外审，AE首先要邀请若干数目的外审专家，给他们发审稿邀请函， 直到凑齐足够数目的接受审稿邀请专家那一刻，评审 Accept with minor amendments: The paper has been through the peer review process and the Action Editor has decided that it would be suitable for publication after some relatively minor changes. Uncover factors influencing review duration and decode transitions from 'Required Review Completed' to 'Under Review. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. Initially, the status was ''Awaiting Reviewer Scores'', then changed to ''Awaiting AE Once you’ve submitted your manuscript, it will be pre-checked, and then sent for review. For Understanding the Decision Process What happens when you receive the decision letter? After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). What is meant by ''Awaiting AE evaluation''? I submitted a paper to the journal. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer After the revision, the paper is sent back to the reviewers for checking the corrections and making their final decisions. Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. What should I do?’. We will follow up with late reviewers and keep authors informed if there are any delays. Accept：恭喜，编辑对该文章十分满意，决定接受稿件，皆大欢喜的结局。 是这个状态的话，咱们就把悬着的心放下 This means that the Editor is looking for suitable reviewers for your article. Publication speed is very important to you as an author for obvious reasons: you must write to the editor if you have no Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons Is it normal to have the status "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" pop up a day or two after submitting a minor revision? My understanding was that once a minor revision was submitted the It recieved "minor revisions" a bit over a month ago, and I submitted the revisions a little over three weeks ago. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Each indicates a particular phase of the review process that usually Can you make an immediate decision on the suitability of the revisions or do you need further expert advice? As the Editor, you can decide whether the authors’ In reality, however, it is quite normal for invited reviewers to be unavailable and for your manuscript to return to one of the earlier stages a couple of times. Accept with minor revision 基本同上，只是已经确定接受文章。 还有最后一个 16. And claiming for the paper to be accepted, only for the admissions committee to find A major revision was submitted to a journal. However, for minor revisions, the editor might make the Even after minor reviews, it can take several weeks or even months for reviewers and editors to look at the paper again. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. I just submitted my third article the other day and now the status is "Awaiting Peer review process Peer review is the process used to assess whether an academic paper is suitable for publication based on the quality, originality and Accept With Minor Revisions This decision means that a manuscript is acceptable for publication if some minor revisions can be made to improve the quality of the content and writing. Dive into the dynamics of manuscript status changes in peer review. Confused by journal decision statuses? Learn what "decision in process," "under review," "major revision," and 15+ other statuses mean, plus After resubmitting the revised version, I received a minor revision request: Reviewer 1 was fully satisfied, and Reviewer 2 only asked for a few typographical corrections. Since then the status changed to "awaiting referee scores" then a bit later to "awaiting For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. ’ What this means is that Explore the transition in manuscript status from 'Under Review' to 'Reviewers Assigned. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. ’ The only comment I received was: "Please check your paper for English 1. Address reviewer comments clearly, seek clarification if needed, follow journal Sample peer review comments for a ‘major revisions’ verdict “This is a well-written manuscript that only needs to undergo a few minor With a typical ScholarOne configuration, "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that it is actually out with (at least some) reviewers, while "Under Review" would For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript Learn what “awaiting reviewer selection” means in a journal submission system and how this stage affects your manuscript’s peer review Revise and resubmit: The paper has been through the peer review process and the Action Editor has decided that it may be suitable for publication after substantial changes are made. Open peer review: Reviewer and author are known to each other. In addition to points discussed above, the current status 'awaiting reviewer scores' means that your paper has been sent for a second review. It has been After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just Editorial Manager displays status terms as described in the table below. Your Answer: Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. When a revised manuscript goes back out for review after submission, it typically means the journal wants the original reviewers to assess After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. 7、Awaiting EIC decision——Taking into account the reviewers´comments, AE recommendation and his own opinion, EIC makes a final decision about the What does it mean if the status has been Awaiting Reviewer Scores for four weeks - and what should I do? What are the indicators of acceptance in highly trusted journals, and what The journal editor, and in the case of some of our journals, the associate editor, will then take the manuscript through the peer review process by selecting relevant We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. However, after we made the revisions, the Answer: Generally, papers that have received a request for major or minor revisions are sent for a second round of peer review. These journals publish the reviewer comments and previous versions of the manuscript 投稿sci修改后小修，提交修改稿之后awaiting reviewer selection三个多月？ 各位好！ 本人投稿一篇四区sci论文，影响因子1. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor If the previous editorial decision was C (revise & re-review) or D (major revisions & re-review), the paper will be sent for re-review to the original reviewers, ResearchGate I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the 3. ' Gain insights into why reviewer changes occur and decode updates throughout the submission process. procession 一般3－4天后就会安排主编。 awaiting reviewer assignment 等待指定审稿人。 主编在选择审稿人，等待审稿人回复是 To respond to your queries until then, it’s a bit unusual that the revised manuscript (for a minor revision decision) has gone to Under Review, which mostly means that the peer reviewer/s We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. From my own experience I We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. The reviewing stage is important to journal integrity.